... or letting them kill themselves?
The AP News had an article which stated that a Dutch researcher found out that it's less cost effective to treat fat people and smokers. The punch line was, of course, that weight-loss, and smoking-cessation commenced immediately once the person was dead. As did incurred costs. To summarize: 'it's cheaper to let people kill themselves than treat the affliction and its symptoms'.
Well ok then.
I guess it's the same approach with helmets and motorcycles. The cost of treating motorcycle accidents goes way down if the person just dies, instead of living on as a cripple. Common sense really. Still there's a segment of the population that likes to treat everyone, for everything, whether real of imagined. I'm sure Darwin is hiding around a corner, like Rod Serling from the Twilight Zone, with his moral in one hand, but still - aside from stating the obvious, do you think anyone will act on this information?
Personally I'm not sure, but maybe after a cigarette and a donut I'll have an opinion...
No Comments/Pingbacks for this post yet...
You want descriptions? Get a dictionary. Better go waste time reading the news or play some games on Yahoo or MSN or some shit like that.
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |