Slice n' Dice

06/21/06

Permalink 11:05:58 am, by u235 Email , 499 words, 36 views   English (US)
Categories: Musings of the Deranged

Slice n' Dice

I feel sorry for the upcoming generation of women, high school girls especially. It seems that parents are less inclined to get their boys circumcised these days. The current rate is down and it's dropping (I don't recall the actual numbers). Sure there's lots of facets on this problem both religious and emotional but usually the argument boils down to the question - does it really benefit men medically?

The medical viewpoint is pretty neutral. If it does provide a medical benefit it's pretty small, but when it comes to a guy's dick maybe decreasing the risk of getting and transmitting AIDS or getting cancer, curing chronic inflammation, etc. is worth it. Some articles point to decreased sensitivity (is that a good thing or a bad thing?). Some articles insist that it's easier for parents who were raised in a generation of circumcision to maintain for a child.

Putting aside the whole religious issue, and Popes who have weighed in on the touchy subject (to the contrary btw - three Popes and the Mormons said that being circumcised had no bearing on faith), "art" seems to have a very definite opinion.

Take a look at most male nudes, at least the famous ones, and you'll see that esthetics deem a circumcised male to be a handsome male - well at least that portion of him. It's not like I have census data on the matter, but from the discussions I can recall at college it seems that most of the females who discussed the topic would agree. I can clearly recall several women who blandly stated that they would never "do" an uncircumcised man, obviously they had their preferences. I can also recall one woman who said she preferred circumcised men because they didn't "jump up and run off to the bathroom to wash the minute they were done". The post-coital cuddle being an essential part that uncircumcised men were missing.

I suppose the saddest story in the current news on the topic is the divorced couple that has gone to court over the proposed circumcision of their son. The boy is 8 and has had several bouts of inflammation. The mom, whom he lives with and has the rights over his medical care, has decided he needs to have this done because it's chronic. Her Ex-husband has fought this because her new husband is a Jew and claims they are only doing this for religious reasons. Sad. Imaging having your parents in court when you're 8 arguing about your dick. Kid is destined to be an axe murderer if there ever was one. I feel for him.

It's difficult I guess, for some people to make the decision when they have a baby. And of course you can't exactly ~ask the infant what his preferences are going to be 20 years from now when it might have an opinion on the matter. Yes it's something you can't exactly give back, but then again - if it's something you never had... how can you miss it?

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: odessa [Member] Email
That is sad. Unless the boy's long term health is at jeapardy or he is in chronic pain, Momma should leave his weinie alone. I've heard, indirectly from guys who did, that it is very painful to have that cut done when you are older. Why put the child through the pain unless there is a definite, tangible, benifit.
PermalinkPermalink 06/21/06 @ 17:17
Comment from: Larathiel [Visitor]
So are You saying that avoiding the bouts of "chronic inflammation" the kid has been having isn't a definite, tangible benEfit or do You suffer selective reading?

The fear and laziness to not correct something that is going to be an ongoing problem (simply because of temporary discomfort) is responsible for a great many of the problems in our world.
PermalinkPermalink 06/21/06 @ 20:17
Comment from: odessa [Member] Email
Have ALL other treatment options been exhausted? Plus there are degrees of "chronic inflammation". I did not say it should NOT be done, just that I can see a reason to defer until all options have been considered. Furthermore, has the kid been asked about this. Many 9 yr olds (especially those with chronic conditions)could process the information and atleast give an opinion of their own. No where was this poor kids opinion mentioned.
PermalinkPermalink 06/23/06 @ 09:57
Comment from: strobe [Visitor]
All for circumcision here. And yes, it is more aesthetically pleasing when done.
PermalinkPermalink 06/26/06 @ 21:19
Comment from: elmo [Visitor]
I agree with odessa. The judge should've talked to the boy and let him give his opinion. It's his weener for christsake.
PermalinkPermalink 06/27/06 @ 19:10

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

u235

You want descriptions? Get a dictionary. Better go waste time reading the news or play some games on Yahoo or MSN or some shit like that.

May 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Search

Misc

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 47

powered by b2evolution free blog software