What the assholes thought up next

06/02/06

Permalink 08:51:14 am, by u235 Email , 544 words, 50 views   English (US)
Categories: We're all goin' down

What the assholes thought up next

I nearly fell out of my chair this morning when I read this one:

U.S. Wants Companies to Keep Web Usage Records

The Justice Department is asking Internet companies to keep records on the Web-surfing activities of their customers to aid law enforcement, and may propose legislation to force them to do so.

The director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert S. Mueller III, and Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales held a meeting in Washington last Friday where they offered a general proposal on record-keeping to a group of senior executives from Internet companies, said Brian Roehrkasse, a spokesman for the department. The meeting included representatives from America Online, Microsoft, Google, Verizon and Comcast.

I really had a hard time getting past the first paragraph. Honestly it makes me so insanely mad that I have a hard time not sputtering epithets incoherently. In fact humor me here, I have to... just to get it out of my system, but I'll try and start politely.

Dear Mr.Mueller and Gonzales, were you always fucking douche bags or was it something you had to learn? A true civil servant wouldn't look for access to rump-fuck our American privacy with a cake server. Can you even understand that your idiotic attempts to rip into our daily lives through copying our phone records, monitoring what books we check out of the library and FUCKING TRAILING US THROUGH THE NET is so amazingly retarded that it shows just how unqualified you are for your jobs? Ok that said, back to the less abrasive side of things.

You know it's charming, in a retarded-kids having sex kinda way how they keep trying to make the same asinine mistakes over and over. The whole collection of calling data was idiotic. It's too much data to actually learn anything from. They haven't seemed to grasp the concept even though it's been spelled out for them. And now they're trying to do the same thing all over again.

Keep track of web surfing activities? Hello? STUPID. STUPID. STUPID. Just look at a fucking history file - how big it gets for one person. Then multiply that times all the users a company has? Again it's volumes and volumes of data. 99.9999% meaningless. Are they going to check every site on every list to see if it has "subversive material"? You sure the fuck can't tell by the name that www.strawberryshortcake.com might be a site about dolls, hentai or blowing up the SF Bay Bridge.

There's redirects. There's computers in freekin Finland that you can hide your browsing. There's software you can use that scrambles your urls. WHAT THE FUCKING GAY YOU MORONS. Again you can tell these idiots had no idea about the volume of data they just asked for, nor how to make it meaningful... not that you ever could.

Personally I have a great idea. I think that AOL -should- set these guys up with a 30 day free version of just what they asked for, and simply email all the data to their accounts at work and at home. And do it every second. Maybe the massively huge, router crushing inundation of data will teach them once and for all what drinking from a fire hose is all about....

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: u235 [Member] Email
To clarify things just a hair... they're asking the internet companies to hold this data on every client for two years. Usually companies ditch this data after just a few weeks or a month at most. And they want these companies to provide this service for free. Free? Any clue here about what data storage and maintenance costs? At that volume?

Someone needs to beat it into their heads, active programs that trace and record suspicious activites is one idea. It's targeted, and limited to just potentially useful information. Just grabbing everything with both hands they can get is NOT.
PermalinkPermalink 06/02/06 @ 09:01
Comment from: fenrus [Visitor]
Who's to say this has anything to do with terrorism? Any more than the laws that are passed "for the children". It's far more likely that it's a power grab and a tool to be wielded against pple that the administration does not favor. Do away with getting warrants and you have the ideal political weapon.

If you think that the information would only be used responsibly, think again. The administration has shown that they are not afraid to use any political weapons at their disposal, regardless of legality.

http://www.coastalpost.com/06/06/08.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/25/AR2006052500213.html
PermalinkPermalink 06/02/06 @ 10:57
Comment from: Roulette [Member] Email
Good luck with that. Even ignoring the technical difficulty of recording / storing that information, I can honestly and with great experience tell you one solid fact: You'll never find anything in it.

Too many packets to look at individually. And if you have a computer try to filter through it, not only will it choke and die, but of the packets it does decided to flag, WAY more than 99.999% will be false positives. Just crap blocking up a filter.

But more realistically, do you know what would happen within hours of this law passing? A new P2P network would be created. And within hours, millions of randomized packets filled with stuff like 'Nuclear' 'CIA' 'Afghanistan' 'Golden Gate' 'Bush is a tool' would be flying around the internet. People would be able to install it like a screen saver, or like that SETI program. Something that would use all of the free cycles from the computer to send junk back and forth to each other on the internet.
PermalinkPermalink 06/02/06 @ 14:08
Comment from: fenrus [Visitor]
They don't need information at the packet level for this to be useful. Just analzying web site log files would provide interesting information. The likelihood of sorting through all the reams to come up with information is dubious, but if you have a specific target in mind, that information is very useful. Precedent has already been set, just look up what kind of files the FBI had on people in the 60's. Now, thanks to the twin boogie men of terrorists and protecting the children, they won't have to bother with getting warrants. Who watches the watchers?

A P2P network wouldn't help if it's illegal to run a site that doesn't turn over it's log files to the government.
PermalinkPermalink 06/02/06 @ 15:40

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

u235

You want descriptions? Get a dictionary. Better go waste time reading the news or play some games on Yahoo or MSN or some shit like that.

July 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Search

Misc

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 14

powered by b2evolution free blog software