When information is just too available

09/22/05

Permalink 03:15:11 pm, by u235 Email , 326 words, 64 views   English (US)
Categories: We're all goin' down

When information is just too available

Before beginning, I'd like to extend my compliments to the JetBlue pilot last night. He did one fucking outSTANDing job of bringing in that plane, just spectacular. Mad props Buddy, Mad.

So the details are, the front landing gear of a JetBlue plane jammed sideways. The plane was carrying 140 passengers. Apparently the pilot, as I said before, and the staff did an excellent job, and landed the plane with no injuries. What I fail to understand is why precisely were they being exposed to news coverage and general panic reporting by CNN...

It seems completely counterintuitive to expose people in a potentially deadly situation to "extreme" news coverage by media agencies trying to exploit the emergency to gain attention. By most standards you want people calm, and manageable so they will listen to you, maximizing the chances they'll follow instruction and their potential for survival. Flashing up external pictures of the plane and listening to "experts" should be reason for fucking criminal charges of 'undue emotional stress'. You're trapped in a plane, you have to circle for a pretty long time to dump or burn off fuel you don't WANT someone estimating the potential death toll or remembering grisly events of other air accidents. "Yeah I feel horrible for those people TRAPPED up there. Chances are maybe HALF will live...." Omfg, stfu.

The media and telecom industries have to realize they have the potential to manage the last moments of people's lives during an accident like this. If you're in a plane, boat, bus where you have access to live media - be fucking SENSITIVE and put on information to help these people stay together and in control. Keep the cell phone lines clear so people on the planes can get through to their families. Yeah it means some coordination - but hell this didn't happen in minutes... it took a while. Support the living you fucktards, don't be buzzards trying to make a buck off their situation.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: sTmykal [Member] Email
So you think that's bad? Get this - the passengers on the plane were able to WATCH all of this coverage from the plane itself.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/09/22/national/main878511.shtml

(CBS/AP) The airliner circled Southern California for hours, crippled by a faulty landing gear, while inside its cabin 140 passengers watched their own life-and-death drama unfolding on live television

While satellite TV sets aboard JetBlue Flight 292 were tuned to news broadcasts, some passengers cried. Others tried to telephone relatives and one woman sent a text message to her mother in Florida attempting to comfort her in the event she died.

"It was very weird. It would've been so much calmer without" the televisions, Pia Varma of Los Angeles said after the plane skidded to a safe landing (video) Wednesday evening in a stream of sparks and burning tires. No one was hurt.

Varma, 23, and other passengers said the plane's monitors carried live DirectTV broadcasts on the plane's problems until just a few minutes before landing at Los Angeles International Airport.
PermalinkPermalink 09/23/05 @ 14:45
Comment from: sTmykal [Member] Email
Oh wait - that's what you were talking about - nm. I thought you meant people in general and not people actaully involved. That's what I get for skimming.
PermalinkPermalink 09/23/05 @ 14:47
Comment from: LonerVamp [Visitor]
Well, two things.

1) Information is the new big things, and getting that information anywhere, everywhere, and quicker. Soon we will be throwing PCs away for mobile phones and PDAs that do everything, including let us watch TV from a plane. Try managing that sort of access to information!

1.5) As a side note, should the passengers of the plane be able to see this? Maybe those televisions should have been turned off. Maybe staff couldn't turn them off? What about the families waiting in the destination terminal watching the TVs?

2) Why should news stations tone it down? Let's see, you have a few hundred people on a plane, maybe another triple that really panicked because they know the people on the plane. Weigh that against milliions of people who may be watching...gee, I think the ecomomics of that are obvious. What needs to happen is lashback against that sort of thing where it suddenly becomes economically beneficial to tone it down (or not tarnish an image, if that is what is valued by the org).

3) People have reality TV wrong. The first successful things were Real World from MTV and Survivor. But reality TV was always around with the news. Living with other people's lives. It needs to be dramatic because this is the ultimate in reality television: live coverage of other people's dramas and trauma and nightmares. CNN with the Gulf War... You bet they will dramatize it and milk it for all it is worth. That's the industry of entertainment for ya, find the next best thing and milk it to death, rinse, repeat.
PermalinkPermalink 09/26/05 @ 01:58
Comment from: LonerVamp [Visitor]
Ok, that was three-and-a-half, and someone needs to get on AIM.
PermalinkPermalink 09/26/05 @ 02:00

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

u235

You want descriptions? Get a dictionary. Better go waste time reading the news or play some games on Yahoo or MSN or some shit like that.

October 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Search

Misc

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 16

powered by b2evolution free blog software