SLC: Many Sides to One Story

08/23/05

Permalink 12:48:48 pm, by sTmykal Email , 301 words, 58 views   English (US)
Categories: Suck It

SLC: Many Sides to One Story

Short story: Rave gets busted in para-military fashion. Charges of brutality and excessive force fly.

The Message Board
The Newspaper
The Newspaper (2)
The Video
More Messageboards

Just before 9/11, much of the music community was upset about the "Rave Act" being passed. The legislation was targeted at illegal parties being thrown by promoters to further the sale of drugs. Sounds noble, right?

However.

Authorities were not just targeting the underground events, they were targeting the ones that were legit - the ones that paid for their permits - the ones that hired security (usually off duty cops) - the ones that paid for liability insurance - the ones that jumped through every single hoop that they had to in order to hold their event.

This is not just limited to raves.

The letter of the law is so loosely written so that any gathering of people, where music may or may not be involved, and where police feel that drugs might be sold, is pretty much open for police action - no warrant - no nothing. This could mean the night club where you go to see your favorite band or dance to music could be shut down at any minute. Any house party that might "look like a rave" is subject to the jack-boot at the door. Trust me - I know from experience. Your local ren faire or book club could even be subject to scrutiny. They won't knock on the door and ask you to "turn it down". They'll drag you out by your hair and beat you down on your front lawn.

So the Rave Act kind of disappeared from the general publics eye after 9/11. There were larger things to worry about in the face of the thousands dead in New York. But the law is still there and it's still being abused. The end.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: ominous [Member]

So whats the point of this really? I don't feel bad for the party getting busted, it was illegal and obviously had illegal activities going on. Most states don't even need the rave act in order to bust a party since alcohol laws are already quite intolerant of any distribution of alcohol, even to friends you have over. All they need is to see evidence of drug or alcohol on the premises and they can check things out.

In this case undercover officers witnessed what was going on and put an end to it. If you are having a small house party, if they see people drinking or doing drugs thru a window or anything, thats all they need. They are only going to show up if the party is reported and then investigated if they see evidence, so I'm not sure why I should feel worried about this law?
PermalinkPermalink 08/23/05 @ 15:28
Comment from: sTmykal [Member] Email
Hell, I don't know - it just pisses me off to see riot squards kicking the shit out of teen-agers I guess.

But really - what set me off on the tangent is the reminder of the Rave Act, which was very specific legislation, targeting not the drug uses, but the events themselves.

There's just as much drug use at any rock show. There's just as much illegal activity at a football game. Hell - there was more criminal activity at MTVs Woodstock than any average "rave". But yet there's a law which can define the simple act of holding an "electronic music dance party" as akin to selling drugs. The business owners who sponsor these events could be convicted as though they were dealing the dope themselves.

Try convicting your local pro sports team for any public intoxocation that might occur with its fans.

It also means that anyone who is *at* the event can be ticketed or arrested, even though they are not guilty of anything other than being there.

Like this...
http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/032405flint.cfm
PermalinkPermalink 08/23/05 @ 18:05
Comment from: odessa [Member] Email
Hmm. Salt Lake City. Hmm.

The morg (smoosh mormon and borg together) aren't know for being tolerant. Wouldn't want the new Zion's youth corrupted you know. Even if more "gentiles" are moving into the beloved center of the LDS church, they better behave or the wrath of God (or atleast the government who is the lapdog of the morg) will smash his iron fist on them.

I've never been to SLC, but I know mormons and trust me, the mormon majority there are none too tolerant of outside influences.
PermalinkPermalink 08/28/05 @ 10:10

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

sTmykal

October 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Search

Categories

Misc

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 32

powered by b2evolution free blog software