Anonymous posting? That's a fine

03/11/08

Permalink 11:39:40 am, by Roulette Email , 263 words, 128 views   English (US)
Categories: Daily Life

Anonymous posting? That's a fine

There is a Kentucky legislator, Tim Couch, who has a very bad idea. Because he's a legislator, he gets to make his bad ideas into bad bills.

He feels that there is a serious problem out there. Online bullying.

And he's got a solution. Of course he does. He wants to ban anonymous posting. Every post online would require it to have a real name, real address and real email associated with it. The real name would be displayed with the post. The web site owner would be liable for ensuring that his site was in compliance ($500 first offense, $1000 each additional).

Beyond the idiotic enforcement problems, this is still an moronicly stupid law. Right now, u235 would owe $500 for themself, and $1000 for each of the other contributors to this blog. Then, on top of that, another $1000 for each visitor reply.

Very quickly, you're well over 10 grand in fines from this site alone because some numbnut lawmaker doesn't like online bullying. This level of stupidity is on the order of Ted Steven's comments about tubes. Frankly, people that far out of touch with the reality of the internet shouldn't ever be in a position to make bills that regulate it. Even if those bills have a snowball's chance in hell of passing properly.

Beyond that, we really don't want MORE information about people being easy to trace online. To be honest, the government should be making more of an effort to educate people about how to protect their privacy online. Identity fraud is a big enough problem without making it easier for the thieves.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Larathiel [Visitor] Email
Awww, and here I was hoping I'd get to engage in Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back vigilanteism on all the e-dorks who would be forced to reveal their identities. ;)
PermalinkPermalink 03/12/08 @ 01:39
Comment from: Anne [Visitor] Email
This is a significant threat to free speech, and I hope that enough people more intelligent than this genius will recognize it as such and shoot it down.
PermalinkPermalink 03/12/08 @ 13:28
Comment from: u235 [Member] Email
Someone needs to turn this guy on to spoofing by using his name to post all sorts of rhetoric all over the web.


..what? That's not being anonymous...
PermalinkPermalink 03/12/08 @ 17:17
Comment from: Jogos Grátis [Visitor] Email
I really didn't have any idea about anonymous posting before. Moreover, I don't like postings anonymously. I'd love to put my name always beside my posts.
PermalinkPermalink 03/12/08 @ 22:54
Comment from: Roulette [Member] Email
That's fine. You're welcome to do it. In general, I consider it a bad idea just because it makes it easier to steal your identity.

More importantly is Anne's comment. It's a serious threat to free speech. In fact, check this out:

McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, Supreme Court Ruling:
Anonymous pamphlets, leaflets, brochures and even books have played an important role in the progress of mankind. Great works of literature have frequently been produced by authors writing under assumed names. Despite readers' curiosity and the public's interest in identifying the creator of a work of art, an author generally is free to decide whether or not to disclose her true identity. The decision in favor of anonymity may be motivated by fear of economic or official retaliation, by concern about social ostracism, or merely by a desire to preserve as much of one's privacy as possible. Whatever the motivation may be, at least in the field of literary endeavor, the interest in having anonymous works enter the marketplace of ideas unquestionably outweighs any public interest in requiring disclosure as a condition of entry. Accordingly, an author's decision to remain anonymous, like other decisions concerning omissions or additions to the content of a publication, is an aspect of the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment.


In other words, Tim Couch can suck a dick.
PermalinkPermalink 03/13/08 @ 09:03
Comment from: odessa [Member] Email
What an ass.

Furthermore, how does this idiot propose enforcing blogs that are 1) sponsored and primarily (or entirely) contributed by people NOT in his state (49 to 1), 2) sponsored in other countries, or 3) sponsored by people smart enough to make it look like it is in other countries.

This moron show just how out of touch most of the moldy old farts in legislators are.
PermalinkPermalink 03/18/08 @ 23:58

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Rou

May 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Search

Categories

Misc

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 26

powered by b2evolution free blog software