NY State passing law against gaming

05/31/07

Permalink 02:11:04 pm, by Roulette Email , 275 words, 84 views   English (US)
Categories: Games

NY State passing law against gaming

So, our friendly neighborhood legislators in New York have penned a new law. They introduced it, and passed it in both the state house and senate in less than a day. They have to work out a few differences between the two and then it'll go to be signed into law. Should be done before the recess at the end of the month.

The law makes it a class E felony to sell indecent, or violent games to minors. Also, it will make it illegal to sell game consoles that don't have parental controls built in (basically, new consoles only).

Amazing. Truly. And like many other lawmakers before them, they know it's unconstitutional. They admit that portions of it closely mirror prior laws that were struck down. They know precedent is against them. And they're aware that not only have those laws been struck down, the but the states that passed them have been put on the hook for the ESA's legal fees used fighting the law. Plus the cost that state will spend defending the damn thing. Hell, I bet the ESA lawyers already are on the clock racking up time on this.

The sponsor of one side even had the balls to say "We have nothing to lose by trying." So, since it's nothing, I vote the ESA receive funds directly from that guys personal bank account. I mean, since it's nothing, it shouldn't matter.

I mean, does New York have nothing better to spend money on? I vote every person that votes for the bill be impeached. Reckless disregard for the constitution. Mismanagement of state legal concerns and financial security.

Fucking idiots.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: u235 [Member] Email
That's a pretty spectacular display of stupidity from my home state. Considering all the other woes New York has to deal with I can't believe this is even remotely a priority.
PermalinkPermalink 05/31/07 @ 22:45
Comment from: odessa [Member] Email
I have no problem with the first part of the law - at least it gives existing laws some teeth. But the console part burns me. Yet another law to inconvenience adults who may want to play video games.

God forbid we make parents monitor their children. Isn't the ultimate parental control taking the damn thing away until they are around and can supervise a bit? But I suppose that might make little Johnny or Jenny mad at Mommy and Daddy and we don't want that. Furthermore, I'm sure the manufacturers are salivating at the sales potential.
PermalinkPermalink 06/01/07 @ 10:52
Comment from: Roulette [Member] Email
See, the first part kills me too. To begin with, it doesn't give existing laws teeth. There are no laws (that aren't stuck down or about to be struck down) on this subject beyond laws that deal with pornography and similar subjects. None of which include any M rated games.

To the actual problems with the law, they don't really define the terms. So violent and indecent are whatever a judge decides.

Second, it's a chilling effect for the industry. With vague terms and felony threats, the industry will be forced to react. Probably by limiting the number of stores that would care M rated content. Because of those limits fewer M rated games would be made.

And third, there are no similar laws for other mediums. Movies, books and music are all self-regulated (or not at all). The video game industry is currently as well. This law puts the force of law behind a private rating organization, another big gov't no-no.

I see why it appeals to parents and lawmakers, but it's still fucking wrong. And it will die like every other attempt. The only good it will do will be to provide further precedent preventing new laws from being enacted.
PermalinkPermalink 06/01/07 @ 11:27
Comment from: odessa [Member] Email
I have not problem with a law restricting sale of questionable items to minor. I agree any similar law is rife with problems - such as definition and enforcement.

Government being taken over by lawyers was the worst thing to ever happen to this country. Lawyers turned legislators have no problem making laws about things of which they have no understanding - although they like to consider themselves experts on everything. I'd like to know when was the last time one of those jerks that came up with this gem - or even their children - worked at a minimum wage job selling video games. I'm sure Jenny and Johnny get nice cushy summer internships - not grinds at the mall like very one else. In other words, they live in ivory towers and are completely entirely out of touch with reality.

Just remember at election time, Hillary loves to limit gamer's freedom - she has sponsored or supported laws restricting games on a federal level.
PermalinkPermalink 06/01/07 @ 17:25

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Rou

May 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Search

Categories

Misc

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 20

powered by b2evolution free blog software