You admit it's wrong???

05/17/06

Permalink 01:16:58 pm, by Roulette Email , 483 words, 70 views   English (US)
Categories: Games

You admit it's wrong???

But you did it anyway. Welcome to my 'Disgraceful Abuse of the Public Trust' List.

Down in Louisiana, the House just passed HB 1381. Basically, it makes the video game rating enforceable by law. If I store sells to underage, they get fined. If the game appeals ‘to the minor's morbid interest in violence’ or is determined to be ‘patently offensive to prevailing standards’, a judge may remove the game from stores entirely. Now, this type of thing has been smacked down as unconstitutional in 6 separate states now due to First Amendment issues. Hell, lemme give you the text of it:

A. An interactive video or computer game shall not be sold, leased, or rented to a minor if the trier of fact determines all of the following:

(1) The average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the video or computer game, taken as a whole, appeals to the minor's morbid interest in violence.
(2) The game depicts violence in a manner patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community with respect to what is suitable for minors.
(3) The game, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.

I’m not blasting them for the bill. I could, but I won’t. The fear mongering Jack Thompson and the Parents Television Council worked their art and scared the House into the vote. It was unanimous. 102-0. Not one member of the House dissented and no one avoided the vote. This is important.

Now, if they actually believed the law would help, I could forgive them to an extent. I’d rant at them for being stupid, but I’d at least understand.

Nope. What gets me is that many of the House members freely admit it will not survive a constitutional challenge. You know, while it’s the court’s responsibility to ensure laws are constitutionally acceptable, there is an onus on the lawmakers to craft laws to meet those same guidelines. And the Louisiana House members just failed their duties to their voters. It’s totally disgraceful.

It’s not even just the time and money they spent crafting the law, talking about it and voting for it. It’s the concept that they think it’s worth wasting the industry’s time and money fighting it. It wastes the court system’s time and money smacking it down. All of those costs get passed down to the citizens.

Admittedly, this is just the House bill. There is a separate bill in the LA Senate that is far more reasonable. The House bill can’t pass muster. The Senate bill has a chance, but it is unlikely.

Regardless, the people in Louisiana have been done injustice by their representatives. You’d think they’d have better things to do down there than try to pass illegal laws. Maybe they could look into rebuilding a levee or something..

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: u235 [Member] Email
Grandstanding at taxpayer expense has always been a fulltime hobby of our professional politicians. Even if laws that make sense do get passed, lawmakers will ensure in one form or another it only serves their best interest EVEN if it means circumventing it.

I'm not saying that lawmakers deliberately deceive their public by crafting laws to fail or purpose, or even ones with explicit loopholes... or am I?

Take the 'earmarking' bill that was just passed but not yet singed into law. It's supposed to outlaw anonymous 'earmarks' for pet projects attached to bills by openly declaring the sponsors. Yes the bill was passed but lawmakers are ignoring because.... it hasn't been signed yet.
PermalinkPermalink 05/17/06 @ 13:28
Comment from: Roulette [Member] Email
editorial commentary on this bill


Managing Editor Jeffrey Zeringue writes in The Daily Comet, "...Why does government feel the need to parent children? ...Few will be persuaded that violent video games or movies have a negative effect on children. It's only a game. It's only a movie. People are smart enough to distinguish the difference, some believe. ...As for me, I believe I can give better guidance to my children than Baton Rouge or Washington."



In the Houma Courier, editor Mike Gorman is even more blunt:

"I could watch football from now until the cows come home and I wouldn't be able to throw like Brett Favre... And I could play Grand Theft Auto for the next 12 years... I don't think I would be looking for policemen to murder or prostitutes to pimp. That's because - and let me phrase this correctly so that even the solons in Baton Rouge can comprehend the message - IT'S JUST A GAME."



And the Shreveport Times savaged both the bill and its principal witness, saying:

"...why would politicians introduce bills that have little chance of standing up in court, and won't really change anything anyway? In the best light, well-meaning politicians are trying to find that magic bullet to combat a societal ill the public fears is de-sensitizing young minds to violent behavior."

"From a less favorable viewpoint, politicians understand such efforts play well with an alarmed public: video games are the latest scapegoats in a tradition that includes comic books, rock 'n' roll, Pokemon cards and other media likely to tarnish the purity of modern youth.

The fact that Jack Thompson is testifying... in favor of the bill should immediately set off alarms. Thompson... evokes no one so strongly as Fredric Wertham, a psychologist whose 1950s book, 'Seduction of the Innocent,' lead to congressional hearings on the dangers of comic books."
PermalinkPermalink 05/18/06 @ 13:04
Comment from: Larathiel [Visitor]
I think a study should be conducted comparing their theory that video games induce violent tendencies in impressionable children vs. my theory that bad legislation induces violent tendencies in rational adults.
PermalinkPermalink 05/19/06 @ 04:12
Comment from: bb [Visitor]
You wanted govt to "care"? Well that's how "care" looks like. Happy with the result?

Bon apetit, morons.
PermalinkPermalink 05/20/06 @ 06:59
Comment from: Roulette [Member] Email
Did I say I wanted them to care? Don't think so. In fact, I'd be much happier if they'd get their fucking noses out of my business.

Nothing done in the name of 'the children' is ever good for society.

Hasta mañana idiot.
PermalinkPermalink 05/20/06 @ 10:32

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Rou

September 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Search

Categories

Misc

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 15

powered by b2evolution free blog software